When I applied to law school in 1996, the process was pretty straight forward. If you did well on the LSAT, had a decent GPA, and proved to be the slightest bit interesting, you were getting in somewhere. I applied to four schools, and was accepted to two second tier programs with scholarships, and waitlisted at two top tier schools. At the end of the day, I was glad that I did not get into my top choice program, as I suspect I would have felt compelled to finish law school and begin a miserable career as an attorney.
In 1997, when I applied to public administration programs, I knew that schools preferred people with some work experience. I hoped that my single year would be enough to get me through the doors of the two programs to which I applied. Immediately, I was accepted at one school and given a scholarship. The program I preferred to go to waitlisted me. Although I ultimately was accepted, I hated that the program was more business-focused than public service oriented, which struck me as odd for a public administration and policy school. I worked while I schooled, finished my two years there, and began a miserable career as a child care policy expert.
Given my history with graduate education, I am not sure why I expected it to be different this time. If anything, the admissions qualifications are even murkier: demonstrate talent. What the fuck does that mean? I tried my best, and sent my writing sample to two programs, knowing that only six people are admitted at one of them.
I knew that I didn't make the cut at Hunter when I didn't get a call in February (hence all my blather about silent bad news), but I didn't have an official rejection, either. At first, I just wanted it to be over with. The longer I lived in limbo, the more I knew that rejection would hurt. This morning, I sent an email to the program director, noting that I understood that the six spots were filled, but if something opened up in the late spring or summer, I would love it if they would consider me. She emailed me back a few hours later and said that she would keep me in mind.
Imagine my surprise when I found my rejection letter from the program in the mail when I got home from work. I realize that suggesting that they eat shit is inappropriate, but I sort of can't help but think it anyway. Fuckers.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Fuckers is right. I'm sorry, Suzanne. They missed the boat on this one.
ReplyDeleteFuckers.
ReplyDeleteBig fuckers. I think that they're "liars".
ReplyDeleteCunty McCuntersons!
ReplyDeleteFuckers and Cunty McCuntersons, indeed. I'm still waiting to hear from New School, which could go either way. Rumor has it that they are still going through applications and admitting people as well as rejecting them. We'll see what happens. And if not, I'll just keep practicing my writing on you all. Mwa ha ha ha.
ReplyDeleteYou are all the best!
I'm sorry - that really bites. And I think you're a great writer - you've had me hooked since your blogher entry about geek girls on TV. And I only read a few blogs - the ones I think are really entertaining.
ReplyDeleteAw shucks. But I'm glad you like it, as you will clearly be subjected to more. Not that I implanted a feed reader in your head or anything. yet....
ReplyDeleteIn light of our conversation on Saturday where I cheered you up and Husband asked what mean, rotten thing I said about somebody else to bring you up, I am trying to think of something appropriately hateful:) This may take some time...
ReplyDeleteSteph
Oh no! That totally sucks but I am happy to have you still writing for all of us...
ReplyDelete