While it is true that I am bitter over the Mets's loss last night, it was their own fault for not playing better, and that is not why I am calling the Cardinals's player Scott Spiezio a snatch face. No, he's a snatch face because someone seems to have given his facial pubes a Brazilian wax. (What is a beard, if not pubic hair on one's face?) And then they dyed it Cardinal red for full effect.I'm no more a fan of facial Brazilians than cootie ones, but an unfortunate sportscaster once asked Spiezio's teammate (not sure which one) what he thought of the red tuft of hair on Spiezio's chin. The guy answered that the team nicknamed it "The Tickler," which mortified the sportscaster. Now calling someone's facial snatch patch a tickler on national TV is damn funny.
Still, go Tigers.
I'm all for red hair, but that guy looks stupid.
ReplyDeleteHe does look stupid. I remember in health class in 6th grade our teacher told us that all pubic hair was the same color so if you saw someone's beard or their armpit hair, you knew what color their hair was in their nether region. Obviously that would not be true if you were to dye your facial snatch patch.
ReplyDeletea.elliot reminds me of when I was in junior high, still dyeing my hair, and stupid immature bouys would ask "if the carpets match the drapes" so to speak. But in junior high boy terms. And since my hair was green, I politely told them that they'd never know.
ReplyDelete"GO Tigers!!!" is right!
ReplyDeleteAnd Jeanie Z was as sincerely "mortified" as any anchor on Faux News. None-the... she does know her baseball, and does her job well.
(... the Tickler... heheheh... Hey. It's just what it's called, eh. {-;)
HELL YES GO TIGERS.
ReplyDeleteI knew I loved you.
And I'm going to be yelling "Snatch Face and POOO-Hole" all night.
It looks like an errant sideburn..
ReplyDelete